IceCap Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 5 minutes ago, Bayne said: Am I the only one who gets annoyed everytime I see the Hurricanes jerseys because the logo looks like it needs to be about 10% bigger? Looks too small in my eyes. I'm annoyed because it's a logo on a dull as dishwater uniform. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayne Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 Just now, Ice_Cap said: I'm annoyed because it's a logo on a dull as dishwater uniform. I don't think its a :censored: logo (Nashville, Anahiem and Winnipeg have worse) but that aside.. I'm Danny fkn Heatley, I play for myself. That's what fkn all stars do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rollins Man Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Bayne said: I don't think its a logo (Nashville, Anahiem and Winnipeg have worse) but that aside.. whats wrong with the preds and ducks logos? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dynasty Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 The thing I like about Nashville's logo are the side-burns. I mean c'mon, does anyone NOT see that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldconcepts Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 5 hours ago, Dolphins Dynasty said: Well, this is so much better than its predecessor, so it's VERY easy to turn a blind eye to most inconsistencies. Twitter: @ldconcepts / Instagram: @ld.concepts / Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayne Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 Have you SEEN the logo on a white jersey? It's weak, flat and the whole idea of a huge fanged predator is kind of lame. Sure, blow any professional sports team logo up nice and big and it looks good, but in the context of how it's used - i don't rate it it at all. The Ducks' logo is poorly executed. It's very uncreative and unrefined. I'm Danny fkn Heatley, I play for myself. That's what fkn all stars do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 4 minutes ago, Bayne said: Have you SEEN the logo on a white jersey? It's weak, flat and the whole idea of a huge fanged predator is kind of lame. Disagree with pretty much all of this. Flat...no. Lame...not really, considering the back story. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayne Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 Just now, WSU151 said: Disagree with pretty much all of this. This works for you? I'm Danny fkn Heatley, I play for myself. That's what fkn all stars do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSU151 Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 It's not the worst logo in hockey. The piping is worse than the logo. Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, Bayne said: This works for you? That's a really poor image to try to use as an example, 1 of the guys has his back to the camera, another has half of his blocked by the other, and the 3rd is practically perpendicular to the camera. You couldn't get a good idea about the logo no matter what team it was if the were pictured like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 33 minutes ago, Bayne said: Have you SEEN the logo on a white jersey? It's weak, flat and the whole idea of a huge fanged predator is kind of lame. Nature must not have gotten the memo. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 3 hours ago, dont care said: That's a really poor image to try to use as an example, 1 of the guys has his back to the camera, another has half of his blocked by the other, and the 3rd is practically perpendicular to the camera. You couldn't get a good idea about the logo no matter what team it was if the were pictured like this. I'd argue it's a perfect image to use - sports uniforms have to be evaluated in context. Not how they look on a mannequin but how they look in a game. Good logos are identifiable and distinct at a distance and under less-than-ideal conditions, which is where the Predators' logo really shows its flaws. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dont care Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 1 minute ago, Gothamite said: I'd argue it's a perfect image to use - sports uniforms have to be evaluated in context. Not how they look on a mannequin but how they look in a game. Good logos are identifiable and distinct at a distance and under less-than-ideal conditions, which is where the Predators' logo really shows its flaws. i think you would have a hard time not identifying that as the predators logo. i dont see any flaws that he is talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcj882000 Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 On 18/01/2017 at 11:42 PM, Bucfan56 said: a shoulder patch that was some strange illuminati-inducing electric tower with the word NASHVILLE underneath it that had zero connection to the rest of the brand. I take it you mean this logo? (Never noticed the big "N" in it until now ) That's the tower built into Nashville Gaylord Sommet Bridgestone Arena. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 Neither did I! I can't believe I missed that. BUT, it brings up two things 1). The logo doesn't even look like that tower. They're WAY different 2). Why do they even have a tower on their arena in the first place? I'm calling a conspiracy on that one. It must be for mind control. Could it be for lightning strikes? Could it be used to control our minds into believing that Tennessee has a hockey team called the Predators that look like futuristic Power Rangers Vehicles on skates? We may never know. Makes you think. On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gothamite Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 Strikes me as being like Gillette Stadium - a silly architectural detail designed for the sole purpose of providing a brand-able element on an otherwise anonymous building. The Green Bay Packers Uniform Database! Now in a handy blog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rollins Man Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 all these people raggin on the preds have no real argument. Its a clean, well designed, unique logo. I cant think of any logo i would confuse it for, and it doesn't really look dated either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sodboy13 Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 If the Preds just stopped the piping where the clavicle and shoulderblade inserts end, instead of running it all the way down to the hem, and put the shoulder patch on both shoulders, I'd have no issues with their jerseys. On 1/25/2013 at 1:53 PM, 'Atom said: For all the bird de lis haters I think the bird de lis isnt supposed to be a pelican and a fleur de lis I think its just a fleur de lis with a pelicans head. Thats what it looks like to me. Also the flair around the tip of the beak is just flair that fleur de lis have sometimes source I am from NOLA. PotD: 10/19/07, 08/25/08, 07/22/10, 08/13/10, 04/15/11, 05/19/11, 01/02/12, and 01/05/12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmic Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 I always assumed that Nashville had a CN Tower, Sun Sphere kinda thing; it's really dumb to have a pointless tower from your brand new arena actually appear in your logo set. If it were a locally famous pointless thing, then that would be a horse of a different color. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 32 minutes ago, Cosmic said: It's really dumb to have a pointless tower from your brand new arena actually appear in your logo set. If it were a locally famous pointless thing, then that would be a horse of a different color. Agreed. The tower is so lazily rendered, the logo could represent any Nashville based company or corporation. Replacing it with the fossilized skull was definitely the right move. Surprised it didn't happen sooner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.