Sec19Row53 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 2 minutes ago, AgentColon2 said: The perfect football uniform exists. Did @zubazpirate hack your account 3 Quote It's where I sit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 21 minutes ago, TruColor said: Good question. I don't know. There isn't a single NFL team that I wouldn't change at least one thing about them. Not sure if I believe in the "perfect uniform". Fair enough. What would you change about the Raiders and Packers, for example? 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timjameskohler Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 RE: The greatest NFL Uniforms: I echo the sentiment with the Buccaneers. Their 1997 - 2013 uniforms need to be considered as one of the best. --Exceptional color scheme --No gimmicks, straightforward striping --Legible numbers --Fun but well-designed logo. It fits in so well with the traditional looks of Chicago, Green Bay, Cleveland, etc. while using a unique color scheme and fun iconography. IN THEORY their current uniform should be one of the best, but they can't get the blasted pewter right. 6 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuordr Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 15 minutes ago, timjameskohler said: RE: The greatest NFL Uniforms: I echo the sentiment with the Buccaneers. Their 1997 - 2013 uniforms need to be considered as one of the best. --Exceptional color scheme --No gimmicks, straightforward striping --Legible numbers --Fun but well-designed logo. It fits in so well with the traditional looks of Chicago, Green Bay, Cleveland, etc. while using a unique color scheme and fun iconography. IN THEORY their current uniform should be one of the best, but they can't get the blasted pewter right. That is my favorite NFL uniform of all time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 44 minutes ago, 655321 said: I see your Zubaz and I raise you some Thunder... These were pretty good too. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruttep Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 1 hour ago, Silver_Star said: I guess I am in the minority and I prefer the white helmets with the 1946 look which makes it better. I never was a fan of Cleveland's orange helmet look with all white. It was ok until it gets tiring to look at and you want the orange pants to match the orange helmets. I just never was a fan much less a fan of putting the 1953 helmets with the 1946 jerseys. See, I thought that the white helmet look was pretty cool in the release photos, but I wasn't a fan of how it showed up on TV, it looked really washed out to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 2 hours ago, rfraser85 said: That would help, but the players wanted the sleeves shortened for the same reason they wanted the jerseys tightened, less to grab onto. Which was fine until the slob shirts came and gave extra material to grab. 5 1 Quote MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lgbaseball8 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 8 hours ago, MJWalker45 said: It's a better version of those uniforms. I'm happy they didn't try to have that stripe go all the way across the back of the jerseys either. I'd say it's a tie. The Color Rash for the Browns is so plain and generic that if you count it in the overall rating it drops the Browns to a C instead of a B+. They don't wear those anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfraser85 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 9 minutes ago, SFGiants58 said: Which was fine until the slob shirts came and gave extra material to grab. Yeah, there's nothing I like about that and no excuse. It shouldn't be that hard to tuck the shirts in. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VDizzle12 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 2 hours ago, infrared41 said: Fair enough. What would you change about the Raiders and Packers, for example? The Packers materials look extremely outdated. Updating to the Nike templates to match the rest of the NFL would be a welcome change. I'd also thicken up the sleeve stripes to match the helmet/pants better and ditch the white pants. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiddySicks Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 Packers at one point almost switched to a look that didn’t have any stripes and used the Niners gold instead of the yellow they currently use. In other words, be careful what you wish for. 5 Quote On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said: She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 Packers could use both green and blue. It’s doable. 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostOfNormMacdonald Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 3 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said: Packers could use both green and blue. It’s doable. Notre Dame sends its regards 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatic Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 Packers are in a "If it ain't broke don't fix it" situation. I don't think their uniforms are particularly amazing, but they are timeless and you don't want to throw that away. 4 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 3 minutes ago, Chromatic said: Packers are in a "If it ain't broke don't fix it" situation. I don't think their uniforms are particularly amazing, but they are timeless and you don't want to throw that away. Eh, there’s things that could be changed. Same with Pittsburgh. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatic Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 Just now, DCarp1231 said: Eh, there’s things that could be changed. Same with Pittsburgh. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should. Like adding blue. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostOfNormMacdonald Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 the NFL aesthetic never should have evolved past the 1920s. If it was good enough for them, it's good enough for me And let's bring back the wedge. That Roosevelt guy was a real wimp for banning that 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruttep Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 6 minutes ago, DCarp1231 said: Eh, there’s things that could be changed. Same with Pittsburgh. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCarp1231 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 3 minutes ago, ruttep said: Because they need it. 1 1 1 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infrared41 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 48 minutes ago, VDizzle12 said: The Packers materials look extremely outdated. Why, because they aren't the latest Nike Zip-Fly Nuclear Reactor Cool-Base X-series 4K made up bull template? 50 minutes ago, VDizzle12 said: ditch the white pants. On that we agree. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.