oldschoolvikings Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The number font and CLEVELAND are killing this set. The rest I like, and I could even live with the contrast stitching.And I know I'm on an island, but the BROWNS on the pant is just awesome. I like it more each time I see it.Exactly.I'm living on Pangea and I hate that pants wordmark more every time I see it. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CitizenTino Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The Browns in Madden 16: Not a fan of the orange socks with the white jersey/white pants combo at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewMLind Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The Browns in Madden 16: Not a fan of the orange socks with the white jersey/white pants combo at all.No way! That's what makes the look. Perfect balance. O-W-W-O Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xist2inspire Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The number font and CLEVELAND are killing this set. The rest I like, and I could even live with the contrast stitching.And I know I'm on an island, but the BROWNS on the pant is just awesome. I like it more each time I see it.Really? It's the other way around for me. I can live with "Cleveland" on the jerseys, but "Browns" on the pants kills this set dead for me. It's the only element that 100% HAS to go, IMO. Tradition is the foundation of innovation, and not the enemy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guest23 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The whole set is a cornucopia of amateur design elements that creates an aesthetic that is completely out of place in the nfl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The number font and CLEVELAND are killing this set. The rest I like, and I could even live with the contrast stitching.And I know I'm on an island, but the BROWNS on the pant is just awesome. I like it more each time I see it.Really? It's the other way around for me. I can live with "Cleveland" on the jerseys, but "Browns" on the pants kills this set dead for me. It's the only element that 100% HAS to go, IMO.I don't like how far down CLEVELAND pushes the numbers. They should start along the collar, but instead start mid-chest and end below the belly. It all looks unbalanced. 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xist2inspire Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The number font and CLEVELAND are killing this set. The rest I like, and I could even live with the contrast stitching.And I know I'm on an island, but the BROWNS on the pant is just awesome. I like it more each time I see it.Really? It's the other way around for me. I can live with "Cleveland" on the jerseys, but "Browns" on the pants kills this set dead for me. It's the only element that 100% HAS to go, IMO.I don't like how far down CLEVELAND pushes the numbers. They should start along the collar, but instead start mid-chest and end below the belly. It all looks unbalanced.Okay, I gotcha. It is a bit too big and poorly positioned. Tradition is the foundation of innovation, and not the enemy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The number font and CLEVELAND are killing this set. The rest I like, and I could even live with the contrast stitching.And I know I'm on an island, but the BROWNS on the pant is just awesome. I like it more each time I see it.Really? It's the other way around for me. I can live with "Cleveland" on the jerseys, but "Browns" on the pants kills this set dead for me. It's the only element that 100% HAS to go, IMO.I don't like how far down CLEVELAND pushes the numbers. They should start along the collar, but instead start mid-chest and end below the belly. It all looks unbalanced.It IS jarring, just because you're not used to seeing it in the NFL. In college there are a few teams with the "belly-number" effect.It's weird to see the effect with an NFL team. It says a lot that an NFL team can feature this design element and it isn't even the most egregious part of the uniform. Bad as the giant chest wordmark is, IMO it isn't as bad as the orange numbers on the brown jersey, and no where near as bad as the dumbass "browns" down the leg. That leg wording is fighting the Jaguars two tone helmet for dumbest NFL design concept ever. http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportzfan Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The number font and CLEVELAND are killing this set. The rest I like, and I could even live with the contrast stitching.And I know I'm on an island, but the BROWNS on the pant is just awesome. I like it more each time I see it.Really? It's the other way around for me. I can live with "Cleveland" on the jerseys, but "Browns" on the pants kills this set dead for me. It's the only element that 100% HAS to go, IMO.I don't like how far down CLEVELAND pushes the numbers. They should start along the collar, but instead start mid-chest and end below the belly. It all looks unbalanced.It IS jarring, just because you're not used to seeing it in the NFL. In college there are a few teams with the "belly-number" effect.It's weird to see the effect with an NFL team. It says a lot that an NFL team can feature this design element and it isn't even the most egregious part of the uniform. Bad as the giant chest wordmark is, IMO it isn't as bad as the orange numbers on the brown jersey, and no where near as bad as the dumbass "browns" down the leg. That leg wording is fighting the Jaguars two tone helmet for dumbest NFL design concept ever. thats because it's a design element that is made for college to identify the teams when there are so many teams that looked the same. The 'CLEVELAND' word mark for the Browns looks completely amateur in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOldRoman Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 mod edit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbannon92 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The number font and CLEVELAND are killing this set. The rest I like, and I could even live with the contrast stitching.And I know I'm on an island, but the BROWNS on the pant is just awesome. I like it more each time I see it.Exactly.I'm living on Pangea and I hate that pants wordmark more every time I see it.POTD for sure Nike + CFL 2015 | 2015-16 NBA Concepts | Complete College Football Redesign Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee. Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 If the numbers were a bit lighter in weight, I'd honestly put this set in the top ten. I also love the word mark on the pants. Keep in mind however that I have little to no use for the NFL in general and will never watch these, but the rest of you, as often happens, keep looking for new ways to outdo each other to say how much you dislike something. I get that new ideas are frowned upon by the community in general, but some of you really need to take a step back and stop hyperbolizing every time you post. Welcome to DrunjFlix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJWalker45 Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 The Browns in Madden 16: Not a fan of the orange socks with the white jersey/white pants combo at all.These shots give me hope that possibly the Browns will trim down the numbers a bit so they don't look so fat. I think that's what bugs me most about the numbers is how fat they look compared to the rest of the league. And I really wish they'd have kept the white socks with B-O-B striping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suns1977 Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 The Browns in Madden 16: Not a fan of the orange socks with the white jersey/white pants combo at all.Least they got the score right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njdawg2000 Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 What it comes down too is it all boils down to what Browns Fans think! And the majority likes them.As for the rest, who cares! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sportzfan Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 What it comes down too is it all boils down to what Browns Fans think! And the majority likes them.As for the rest, who cares!And you know that how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njdawg2000 Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 What it comes down too is it all boils down to what Browns Fans think! And the majority likes them.As for the rest, who cares!And you know that how?Polls, radio shows ect. Ect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jezus_Ghoti Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 What it comes down too is it all boils down to what Browns Fans think! And the majority likes them.As for the rest, who cares!The membership of this website cares, for one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmd9 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 What it comes down too is it all boils down to what Browns Fans think! And the majority likes them.As for the rest, who cares!And you know that how?Polls, radio shows ect. Ect.I can back him up on this one. The reactions to the new uniforms have been overwhelmingly positive among Browns fans. Seems that both the old school fans and the younger generation both are happy with the change. The only negative reaction was to the "new" logo. Most wanted to see an actual logo, and not an illustration of a piece of equipment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLEstones Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 What it comes down too is it all boils down to what Browns Fans think! And the majority likes them.As for the rest, who cares!And you know that how?Polls, radio shows ect. Ect.I can back him up on this one. The reactions to the new uniforms have been overwhelmingly positive among Browns fans. Seems that both the old school fans and the younger generation both are happy with the change. The only negative reaction was to the "new" logo. Most wanted to see an actual logo, and not an illustration of a piece of equipment. Co-signed. I work with a couple guys who constantly talk to "the old Browns" and "the way things used to be" and bla bla bla that same stuff I hear every day in this City. They like the uniforms. They didn't think the Browns needed a change, but they liked the update. One of the guys 50+ even said the wordmark on the pants was the best in the NFL.So, just like anything in life... take it for what its worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.