the admiral 28,190 Posted March 25, 2015 lol at the mental picture of a bunch of ululating kooks rolling into a city of opulence in their busted Toyota Tundras. It'll be just like that time I crashed a confirmation party at Medinah Country Club, but with less ululating. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JasonFromMiami 58 Posted March 25, 2015 you got me convinced, watching soccer right now, 1-0 allready ! going to be high scoring.....but what the hell is team usa wearing ? ugh ! royal blue jersey with navy shorts , lol 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JasonFromMiami 58 Posted March 25, 2015 lol at the mental picture of a bunch of ululating kooks rolling into a city of opulence in their busted Toyota Tundras. It'll be just like that time I crashed a confirmation party at Medinah Country Club, but with less ululating.Looks like the admiral is watching team USA while rooting for team LSD or is it team THC ? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dbadefense1990 369 Posted March 25, 2015 And who says a 0-0 can't be a good game? Italy's semifinal vs. Germany in 2006 is widely regarded as one of the best games of this past decade, and it was 0-0 until the 119' minuteUntil the 7-1 Maracanazo II Germany put up against Brazil last year, I'd never seen a home, World Cup crowd so stunned and saddened by a World Cup game outcome as on that day when Italy opened up the floodgates near stoppage time in that 2nd extratime in that 2006 semifinal. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HedleyLamarr 1,393 Posted March 26, 2015 Triple the goal size, but add a second goalie. Now we're talking.Is there a way soccer can work in that once-a-game-gorilla that we championed for in future NFL rule changes?We do need more shenanigans in sports. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the admiral 28,190 Posted March 26, 2015 A gorilla? Can we trust Europeans to handle that maturely? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin W. 1,875 Posted March 26, 2015 And who says a 0-0 can't be a good game? Italy's semifinal vs. Germany in 2006 is widely regarded as one of the best games of this past decade, and it was 0-0 until the 119' minuteUntil the 7-1 Maracanazo II Germany put up against Brazil last year, I'd never seen a home, World Cup crowd so stunned and saddened by a World Cup game outcome as on that day when Italy opened up the floodgates near stoppage time in that 2nd extratime in that 2006 semifinal.The term is actually Mineirazo. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NJTank 1,129 Posted March 26, 2015 I think Soccer needs to eliminate the off-sides rule and that will open up scoring and help boost American Interest. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gothamite 23,652 Posted March 26, 2015 Shut up, Meg. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bosrs1 1,288 Posted March 26, 2015 I think Soccer needs to eliminate the off-sides rule and that will open up scoring and help boost American Interest.Soccer has like 5 rules and you want to eliminate one of them? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2001mark 1,204 Posted March 26, 2015 I think Soccer needs to eliminate the off-sides rule and that will open up scoring and help boost American Interest.No. Doesn't offsides promote action by pulling defenses out into action, ever tilting the field back & forth, instead of guys standing like a wall in the box all game? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IanC 59 Posted March 26, 2015 I think Soccer needs to eliminate the off-sides rule and that will open up scoring and help boost American Interest.That would make it less high scoring as defences would virtually be standing on the goal line as a striker would always be virtually standing in the oppositions box all the time which would lead to high punts up the field and ruin the passing aspect. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robertsports 5 Posted August 3, 2015 Well, it turns out he was right. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bosrs1 1,288 Posted August 4, 2015 Well, it turns out he was right.Didn't take a rocket scientist to make the statement Garber did. Anyone not taking a FIFA bribe could see Qatar was going to be a :censored:show. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2001mark 1,204 Posted August 4, 2015 So where to for 2022?I say USA with a couple opening games in Canada. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DScruggy729 358 Posted August 4, 2015 So where to for 2022?I say USA with a couple opening games in Canada.The U.S. doesn't need Canada. We would have it already if FIFA didn't like shiny new stadiums (or plans for them) and technology that doesn't exist. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlackBolt3 1,380 Posted August 4, 2015 So where to for 2022?I say USA with a couple opening games in Canada.FIFA won't allow a joint bid between two large countries, especially when one only hosts a few games. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BBTV 19,371 Posted August 5, 2015 Is Canada considered a "large" country? Do they base that on population or geography? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Evil G 99 Posted August 5, 2015 Is Canada considered a "large" country? Do they base that on population or geography?They base it on the largest bribes. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the admiral 28,190 Posted August 5, 2015 Is Canada considered a "large" country? Do they base that on population or geography?Well, they're in the G7. A dual France-Germany bid would probably be frowned upon for more or less the same reason. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
