Jump to content

NHL Anti-Thread: Bad Business Decision Aggregator


The_Admiral

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, tigerslionspistonshabs said:

I've always had a soft spot for the Yotes, so I hope it works out for them, but I feel as though no one really gives enough of a crap about them to really try to get something built. The best solution would be to move into the Suns arena, but I know the Suns aren't exactly rolling out a welcome mat.

 

Did the recent renovation of that arena make it suitable for hockey? They played there for their first 6 or 7 years in Phoenix and it was....suboptimal. 

 

glw%2B3qQgJ3hkO0=&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0

 

 

  • Like 3

PvO6ZWJ.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tigerslionspistonshabs said:

I've always had a soft spot for the Yotes, so I hope it works out for them, but I feel as though no one really gives enough of a crap about them to really try to get something built. The best solution would be to move into the Suns arena, but I know the Suns aren't exactly rolling out a welcome mat.

I mean, Tempe seems pretty keen on it; the RfP they've put out is explicitly looking for a pro sports venue, and the only team really in need of a new location in the city is the 'Yotes; the D-Backs, Suns, Cards and Rising are all pretty well-off where they all currently sit, so I doubt any of them are looking for new buildings.

 

Besides, I feel like the NHL won't want to relocate to a market that's basically the same size when they could just expand to Houston and have more large media markets then they already do. They're not always the keenest, but even the NHL isn't that dumb; they only left Atlanta when there was literally nowhere for them to play and no time to find a new building.

 

The Coyotes could always hole up at the Vet while a new building is made, like what the Isles did with Nassau during UBS' construction; it's not ideal and not up to modern NHL standards, but it's still somewhere for the team to play on a temporary basis, with the benefit of being closer to the rich folk in Phoenix then Glendale is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/21/2021 at 6:55 AM, BBTV said:

 

As far as record books go, when it comes to teams that don't matter, dissolving them is cleaner than moving them.  Dissolve the Thrashers, establish Jets 2.0, have an expansion draft where they can draft any Thrashers player or a non-protected player from any other team (but let teams protect more players than usual), then fill in any gaps with ex-Thrashers (and then let other teams draft whatever is left over.)  I think that's similar to the "de-merger" of the Stars/Sharks.

 

Doesn't solve a situation like Cleveland-Baltimore, but for teams that don't really matter like the Thrashers, Coyotes, TB Rays, etc. it solves some issues.

 

Not sure what I would have done with the Bobcats/Hornets/Pelicans situation, but what ended up happening was the absolute worst of all options.

 

But seriously though, what would've been a better way to solve the NBA conundrum if what they did with the New Orleans/Charlotte situation was so horrible???

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Nassau Coliseum underwent extensive renovations before the Islanders moved back. The old Suns arena is in no condition to host the NHL and I doubt they can get it there. God, I've seen enough, call it.

  • Like 9

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ridleylash said:

I mean, Tempe seems pretty keen on it; the RfP they've put out is explicitly looking for a pro sports venue, and the only team really in need of a new location in the city is the 'Yotes; the D-Backs, Suns, Cards and Rising are all pretty well-off where they all currently sit, so I doubt any of them are looking for new buildings.

 

Besides, I feel like the NHL won't want to relocate to a market that's basically the same size when they could just expand to Houston and have more large media markets then they already do. They're not always the keenest, but even the NHL isn't that dumb; they only left Atlanta when there was literally nowhere for them to play and no time to find a new building.

 

The Coyotes could always hole up at the Vet while a new building is made, like what the Isles did with Nassau during UBS' construction; it's not ideal and not up to modern NHL standards, but it's still somewhere for the team to play on a temporary basis, with the benefit of being closer to the rich folk in Phoenix then Glendale is.

If it makes you feel better, I'm sure they'll keep the kachina stuff up as part of the NHL vintage collection once the team moves.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Ridleylash said:

I mean, Tempe seems pretty keen on it; the RfP they've put out is explicitly looking for a pro sports venue, and the only team really in need of a new location in the city is the 'Yotes; the D-Backs, Suns, Cards and Rising are all pretty well-off where they all currently sit, so I doubt any of them are looking for new buildings.

 

Besides, I feel like the NHL won't want to relocate to a market that's basically the same size when they could just expand to Houston and have more large media markets then they already do. They're not always the keenest, but even the NHL isn't that dumb; they only left Atlanta when there was literally nowhere for them to play and no time to find a new building.

 

The Coyotes could always hole up at the Vet while a new building is made, like what the Isles did with Nassau during UBS' construction; it's not ideal and not up to modern NHL standards, but it's still somewhere for the team to play on a temporary basis, with the benefit of being closer to the rich folk in Phoenix then Glendale is.


Aside from the VMC talk, which is insane (but I guess I get it?), Tempe has issues too. Phoenix Rising just left Tempe and moved into a new building with a Coyotes like situation  specifically because they couldn’t get anything done in Tempe. 

  • Like 2

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, neo_prankster said:

 

But seriously though, what would've been a better way to solve the NBA conundrum if what they did with the New Orleans/Charlotte situation was so horrible???


Just acknowledge that the cha hornets are the same franchise as the bobcats and the Pelicans the same as the old hornets. 
 

They need to make the decision at the time the team moves. Can’t retcon later.  

  • Like 3

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, BBTV said:


Just acknowledge that the cha hornets are the same franchise as the bobcats and the Pelicans the same as the old hornets. 
 

They need to make the decision at the time the team moves. Can’t retcon later.  

 

The NHL let the Jets have the IP but not the records, so the Jets kludged it by tracking "Winnipeg NHL history," in other words, staking a claim to the 72-96 records in spite of what the league said and orphaning the Thrashers' records, which is fine enough, I guess. 

EDIT: if we somehow stop living in a terrible world for just one minute and Jeremy Jacobs lets Quebecor buy the Coyotes, it's likely that the NHL will have to do a messy Bobcats/Pelicans retcon to make a semblance of sense from the Jets and Nordiques interweaving, in which the Jets and Nordiques become continuous franchises that took naps, the Avs and Coyotes will have been new franchises, and the Thrashers and Coyotes ended. Yeah, it's stupid and annoying. Should have stopped Canadian teams from moving in the first place B) 

EDIT 2: "will have been new" is just bending laws of time and space, isn't it, this verb tense makes me tense

  • Like 6

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The NWHL is now the PHF because too many people could intuitively grasp what NWHL stood for. PHF sounds like one of the sixty-ten different abbreviations used by that crappy league with the team in Port Huron.

♫ oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ♫

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, the admiral said:

The NWHL is now the PHF because too many people could intuitively grasp what NWHL stood for. PHF sounds like one of the sixty-ten different abbreviations used by that crappy league with the team in Port Huron.

1631013447_full_copy.5.jpg

The logo needs some work. 

"The logo is supposed to pay tribute to the history of the NWHL with the black and white color scheme and stars carrying over from its previous logo. The stars form a crown to symbolize achievement and ambition of the PHF athletes. The outline of the crown also forms a “Subtle ‘W’” to represent the concept of raising women to the top."

  • Like 2

km3S7lo.jpg

 

Zqy6osx.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, MJWalker45 said:

"The logo is supposed to pay tribute to the history of the NWHL with the black and white color scheme and stars carrying over from its previous logo. The stars form a crown to symbolize achievement and ambition of the PHF athletes. The outline of the crown also forms a “Subtle ‘W’” to represent the concept of raising women to the top."

spacer.png

It's stars that form a crown, it doesn't need a goddamn backstory lmao

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it was supposed to look like the crown of the Statue of Liberty. Also, if you need more than a few sentences to explain what a logo is, then that logo sucks. It’s a visual representation of what your organization is supposed to represent not an abstract art project. Logos and memes have similar functions now that I think about it and coincidentally, putting a ton of text into a meme makes it suck too.
 

All that fluff just feels masturbatory to me. 
 

 

Edited by Red Comet
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, the admiral said:

Is a subtle W like a consummate V?

 

Guy wouldn't know majesty if it came up and bit him in the face.

  • Like 2

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, the admiral said:

Is a subtle W like a consummate V?

1 minute ago, BBTV said:

 

Guy wouldn't know majesty if it came up and bit him in the face.

With none of that chiaroscuro shading crap.

  • Like 3

VmWIn6B.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LMU said:

With none of that chiaroscuro shading crap.

 

the S is for sucks.  Need a more different S.

  • Like 3

"The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.