Rj0498 Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 24 minutes ago, VancouverFan69 said: Something like this? it looks like something stuck in the 90s bulging biceps angry face and wielding a object in a menacing manner this looks like one of rob liefelds creations I think the orca is not that bad of a logo or heck I liked the flying skates maybe they could bring it back in their current colors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan33 Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 3 minutes ago, Rj0498 said: it looks like something stuck in the 90s bulging biceps angry face and wielding a object in a menacing manner this looks like one of rob liefelds creations I think the orca is not that bad of a logo or heck I liked the flying skates maybe they could bring it back in their current colors Yeah, that logo makes the Fisherman look tasteful, and the amputated Orca logo doesn't fit that aesthetic in the slightest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcj882000 Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 31 minutes ago, VancouverFan69 said: It's a little ironic given the other debate happening, but this is what a 90's version of Johnny Canuck would look like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clonewars2008 Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 4 hours ago, Morgo said: - Both logos have nothing to do with the history of their respective franchises. The Canucks never used 'Johnny' and the Islanders should have never used 'Gorton' after their early, historic success. Actually yes, before the Canucks joined the NHL they were in the WHL and that was their logo. So Johnny Canuck is historic to the Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clonewars2008 Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 4 hours ago, Morgo said: The Red and Blue 'Johnny' is an old-timey mascot logo. The blue and green one is a 90's extreme remake, just like the Fisherman. The only difference being that latter was made in the late 2000's. We're not talking about the WHL Canucks. We are talking about the NHL team established in 1970 that has never used the logo. They are the same team, granted as an expansion team to the NHL in 1970 yes but it's just like the WHA team that came in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Around the Horn Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 About the Fishsticks jerseys, the only mistake they made was using the fisherman for the front. The lighthouse logo is far superior... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndrewG70 Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 5 hours ago, CreamSoda said: You must struggle with these too then: - What is this? Canadiens have more definition than a smile face. Actually, that Canadiens logo kinda looks like a sideways toilet seat to me. ? The (unofficial) NHL Uniform DatabaseThe WHA Uniform Database Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildwing64 Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 5 hours ago, CreamSoda said: - I do not see one building in those letters... ...Or capital letters. Spoiler PotD: 24/08/2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockey week Posted November 6, 2016 Share Posted November 6, 2016 Wasn't the Vancouver Giants logo initially designed for the Canucks and they passed on it? Because I've always been a fan of that logo I'll respect any opinion that you can defend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worcat Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 Eh, this conversation has completely hit the fan. People complaining about the Johnny Canuck logo being too cartoonish yet the Ducks use a literal cartoon goalie mask in the shape of a ducks face. While I love the Mighty Ducks logo, skating Penguin etc, the Johnny Canuck logo would be just fine. If a depiction of a male lumberjack offends you, I'd hate to ask you how you feel about the Washington Redskins. It's a sports team/logo. Just stop already Bleeding Blue since 1986 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldconcepts Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 Double... Twitter: @ldconcepts / Instagram: @ld.concepts / Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldconcepts Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 On 2016-09-22 at 3:24 PM, NeverSayNever said: Here we go again... 8 hours ago, VancouverFan69 said: Twitter: @ldconcepts / Instagram: @ld.concepts / Website Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel75 Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 1 hour ago, worcat said: Eh, this conversation has completely hit the fan. People complaining about the Johnny Canuck logo being too cartoonish yet the Ducks use a literal cartoon goalie mask in the shape of a ducks face. While I love the Mighty Ducks logo, skating Penguin etc, the Johnny Canuck logo would be just fine. If a depiction of a male lumberjack offends you, I'd hate to ask you how you feel about the Washington Redskins. It's a sports team/logo. Just stop already I wouldn't say anyone was offended, but yes, the conversation has become tiresome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceCap Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 Redskins? Mighty Ducks? We're a grey facemask reference away from making this the most obnoxious CCSLC discussion ever. PotD 26/2/12 1/7/15 2020 BASS Spin the Wheel, Make the Deal Regular Season Champion 2021 BASS NFL Pick'em Regular Season Champion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltravesty Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 are the Oilers 3rds and Florida Panthers new jerseys with the numbers on the shoulders and patches above the arm stripe, the future of NHL sweaters? Does anyone else like them? I love the look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FGM13 Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 11 minutes ago, coltravesty said: are the Oilers 3rds and Florida Panthers new jerseys with the numbers on the shoulders and patches above the arm stripe, the future of NHL sweaters? Does anyone else like them? I love the look. The Oilers 3rds are a straight throwback to these, so it's not really a modernity thing with those. GO OILERS-GO BLUE JAYS-GO ESKIMOS-GO COLTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rj0498 Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 It still looks awesome also every time I see the avs alts the more I want them to be the primary because right now they have one of the uglier looks in the league imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockey week Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 Depends on how arenas are going with press-box height. Remember, those sleeve numbers serve a purpose: they're typically the first and most-often used identifier of the players for the broadcast team. Players don't have their backs to the broadcast booth often enough to be the standard. Therefore, those sleeve numbers are absolutely vital. I've announced games with teams that don't have them, and it's hell. Absolutely awful games to call. The shoulders work if you're up high enough. Otherwise, they're a lot less helpful than sleeve numbers. I know that I've never been placed up high enough for that to work for me, but I couldn't tell you at NHL rinks. I'll respect any opinion that you can defend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnPheitseog Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 45 minutes ago, hockey week said: Depends on how arenas are going with press-box height. Remember, those sleeve numbers serve a purpose: they're typically the first and most-often used identifier of the players for the broadcast team. Players don't have their backs to the broadcast booth often enough to be the standard. Therefore, those sleeve numbers are absolutely vital. I've announced games with teams that don't have them, and it's hell. Absolutely awful games to call. The shoulders work if you're up high enough. Otherwise, they're a lot less helpful than sleeve numbers. I know that I've never been placed up high enough for that to work for me, but I couldn't tell you at NHL rinks. Would you imagine this is the reason that shoulder numbers are a lot more popular in the NFL, because of how high up press/announcers are? Formerly known as DiePerske Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddball Posted November 7, 2016 Share Posted November 7, 2016 2 hours ago, Ice_Cap said: Redskins? Mighty Ducks? We're a grey facemask reference away from making this the most obnoxious CCSLC discussion ever. No the grey facemask wouldn't do it, because we have no references yet to the Cleveland Browns or the San Diego Padres brown and gold debate.... oh wait, I think I just made it the most obnoxious discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.