Jump to content

San Diego MLS expansion


MrOrange

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Survival79 said:

 

Quote

“the crest is said to center around four “principal virtues” that define San Diego: “Gratitude, proud, not loud, diversity and a state of flow.”

 

This :censored: actually makes my head hurt. This sounds like they typed “Make an MLS Expansion team for San Diego, California.” Into Chat GPT and didn’t even bother proofreading it. 

Our four (4) principal values: 

1. [compliment new market]
2. [Subtly mention the team we’re replacing]
3. [ Use the word “diversity”]

4. [Throw in some gobbledy(I am racially insensitive) action words that sounds like something a Californian/stoner would say]

 

 

This league is a joke. 

  • Like 5
  • LOL 2

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When your league is constantly making headlines for poor logo design (Chicago crown, Montreal snowflake, Columbus flag, and now San Diego) maybe, just maybe you should hire some design consultants Don Garber. It is embarrassing. 

 

This goes without mentioning that Nashville is not very good and St. Louis almost immediately pivoted to their secondary logo that I believe will be the primary within a few years. 

  • Like 6

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone keeping track, that's the 6th [City] FC (or something like it) in the last 8 expansion teams, and 10th overall:

 

1. FC Dallas (2004)

2. Toronto FC (2007)

3. New York City FC (2015)

4. Los Angeles FC (2018)

5. FC Cincinnati (2019)

6. Nashville SC (2020)

7. Austin FC (2021)

8. CF Montreal (2021)

9. Charlotte FC (2022)

10. San Diego FC (2025)

 

Creativity is dead. Can't wait for Las Vegas FC and Phoenix FC in 2026

  • Applause 1
  • Sad 1

ExJworW.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, FiddySicks said:

 

 

This :censored: actually makes my head hurt. This sounds like they typed “Make an MLS Expansion team for San Diego, California.” Into Chat GPT and didn’t even bother proofreading it. 

Our four (4) principal values: 

1. [compliment new market]
2. [Subtly mention the team we’re replacing]
3. [ Use the word “diversity”]

4. [Throw in some gobbledy(I am racially insensitive) action words that sounds like something a Californian/stoner would say]

 

 

This league is a joke. 

I don't hate the crest as much, but everything else about it doesn't vibe with me, how can chrome be a color on a jersey? Are we looking at the Trash Bag Mavs?

 

So I took your prompt and this is what ChatGPT gave me, much better than the actual team.:

 

Team Name: San Diego Surf FC

Colors: Blue and Gold

Logo: The team's logo could feature a wave or surfboard design to represent the coastal location of San Diego, with blue and gold colors to reflect the sea and sunshine.

 

 

  • Like 5
  • WOAH 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wentvoltage123 said:

The MLS has got to start asking the fans more for input on new logos because it seems like every rebrand for the past few years other than the Sounders has been terrible.

I feel the way it works sometimes is the team asks for a logo, and while the team is getting community/fans input, SUM separately hire some company to do their own logo independent of the team. These ideas are then combine, the fans input gets ignored, and then the league gets some designs, and then they take their one choice to the team and be like "Take it or leave it". I feel like Columbus (name change), Montreal (snowflake), Chicago (fire logo), owners did not have a choice this is what the league gave them. And part of the way to save face was those owners were forced by the league to take the bullet. 

 

I think the Sounders had enough clout to say NO to MLS/SUM to be able to have more control. I would say Portalnd (when they switched to the secondary) and LA (lafc) as well.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, aawagner011 said:

This is up there as one of the worst crests in the league, alongside Columbus and Nashville.

That San Diego badge is bad, but I actually like the Columbus badge. It's not a roundel, it kept the team colors and the pennant design is a bit different. That C in the badge could use a change though, I'll admit. That San Diego badge is more useful for a league design than a team's own badge. 

  • Like 1

km3S7lo.jpg

 

Zqy6osx.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PrimalCookie said:

For anyone keeping track, that's the 6th [City] FC (or something like it) in the last 8 expansion teams, and 10th overall:

 

1. FC Dallas (2004)

2. Toronto FC (2007)

3. New York City FC (2015)

4. Los Angeles FC (2018)

5. FC Cincinnati (2019)

6. Nashville SC (2020)

7. Austin FC (2021)

8. CF Montreal (2021)

9. Charlotte FC (2022)

10. San Diego FC (2025)

 

Creativity is dead. Can't wait for Las Vegas FC and Phoenix FC in 2026

 

13 hours ago, wentvoltage123 said:

The MLS has got to start asking the fans more for input on new logos because it seems like every rebrand for the past few years other than the Sounders has been terrible.

 

As a Vancouver WHITECAPS supporter, I am so bored to death of MLS's lethargic globalist branding. North America has multiple major sports leagues. It feels like MLS wants to cater to international Football supporters and to hell with North American Soccer supporters. 

 

North American Soccer was so much fun when the NASL was in its heyday...Vancouver Whitecaps, Seattle Sounders, Portland Timbers, NY Cosmos, LA Aztecs, Toronto Blizzard, Minnesota Kicks, Tampa Bay Rowdies, Edmonton Drillers, Montreal Manic, Fort Lauderdale Strikers, Chicago Sting, etc, etc.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MJWalker45 said:

That San Diego badge is bad, but I actually like the Columbus badge. It's not a roundel, it kept the team colors and the pennant design is a bit different. That C in the badge could use a change though, I'll admit. That San Diego badge is more useful for a league design than a team's own badge. 

The Roundel made some sense for Crew though, as it formed an O for Ohio and it did keep the shape of the first logo for the team in the form of a container for the foundation date. Nothing wrong with a roundel if it's done well, and it strays away from the sterile "City Group" style.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, VancouverFan69 said:

 

 

As a Vancouver WHITECAPS supporter, I am so bored to death of MLS's lethargic globalist branding. North America has multiple major sports leagues. It feels like MLS wants to cater to international Football supporters and to hell with North American Soccer supporters. 

 

North American Soccer was so much fun when the NASL was in its heyday...Vancouver Whitecaps, Seattle Sounders, Portland Timbers, NY Cosmos, LA Aztecs, Toronto Blizzard, Minnesota Kicks, Tampa Bay Rowdies, Edmonton Drillers, Montreal Manic, Fort Lauderdale Strikers, Chicago Sting, etc, etc.

 

Agree wholeheartedly-- from the full front jersey ads, to the totally repetitive use of FC, SC, UNITED, not to mention rip offs like Real Salt Lake  and Inter Miami, it's like they are going Eurosnob overboard. 

The best names and identities in MLS are the  four west coast franchises based upon NASL teams.

  • Like 1
  • Applause 1

It is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, VampyrRabbit said:

The Roundel made some sense for Crew though, as it formed an O for Ohio and it did keep the shape of the first logo for the team in the form of a container for the foundation date. Nothing wrong with a roundel if it's done well, and it strays away from the sterile "City Group" style.

The roundel did make sense. One of the few good ideas that came out during Anthony Precourt's Tenure as owner of the crew. Personal opinion, I think the Ohio Pennant Flag as a crest works better than a roundel. But the current crest the Crew have missed the mark. Revisions are sorely needed. (The Idea works, the execution of said Idea did not work)

 

As far as San Diego FC crest goes: Its passable. Its a crest. Doesn't scream "San Diego". And all those lines make this crest feel more like a volleyball team than an association football club.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The absolute worst crest in all of MLS. The chrome is bad enough but at least it could be forgiven, the rainbow-adjacent gradient outline is heinous.

 

The primary visual on the logo also is just some abstract lines and curves that mean nothing. They fabricated four “virtues” to justify something that isn’t identifiable as anything.

 

And as for those “virtues” I don’t think it makes a lot of sense for one of them to be - literally - that they aren’t loud.

  • Like 2

MZnWkGU.png

StL Cardinals - Indy Colts - Indiana Pacers - Let's Go Blues! - Missouri State Bears - IU Hoosiers - St Louis City SC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.