bowld Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 I really dont see the need for a Black swoosh on the whites. Awesome update but that black swoosh is brutal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Book it. The minuscule black swoosh will eventually lead to this  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJD7 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 As expected, they went with the Color Rush font, which is a huge upgrade. Definitely my favorite part of this update.  I wish the facemask couldâve been switched to white. Oh well.  The new wordmark is alright, if not a bit generic. An update to the traditional wordmark wouldâve been cool to see.  Like others have said, the alternate logo is a bit of a swing & miss, especially when they could just rotate the horseshoe to make an easy âCâ logo.  The inclusion of the black Nike swoosh is baffling, although pretty harmless.  I also didnât realize the helmet logo was different than the primary before this update. Interesting.  Overall, Iâd say itâs an upgrade, since most of the bad parts about it are miniscule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFB Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 The new wordmark is perfectly fine in a vacuum, but it's a weird fit for the Colts. They have a very thin and rounded logo, yet they chose to partner that with a very heavy and square typeface. It's a weird fit to me... I think what makes it worse is the angled crossbar on the "S," which gives the wordmark far more of a modern feel than a traditionl block font. Again, in a vacuum, it's fine, but I don't think that meshes with the historic and traditional Colts very well.  Another aspect I'll miss is the fact that the Colts wordmark on the old helmets was the same width as the stripe, visually continuing it onto the helmet bumper.  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Nike, take notes from UA on UCLA stripes:   Other than that, I like the font change. The wordmark is fine (the old one was a bit too old-fashioned, IMHO), while the black swoosh is whatever (please no black alt) and the alternate design is fine. The logo standardization was a good move, but I wish they made the old helmet logo the print design. I do wish the socks had stripes, but oh well.  Overall, itâs good but could be better. MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kestrel79 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 We all know down the road a anvil black and facemask gray alternate uniforms are coming...thanks Nike woof.  I like the number and font changes. Numbers maybe a touch too big and close together for my tastes but that's about all I got.  No blue pants? I really dug that look from the Harbaugh QB era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk36 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 35 minutes ago, MEANS said: Secondary logo is pretty clunky and then there's this.   Wow. I hope they pay/paid for the usage. That's even beyond the level of the Rams. Design Hovie Studios Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Survival79 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 53 minutes ago, DEAD! said: The secondary logo is very unnecessary. If I were to change anything, it's change it from a 'C' to a 'U'. (Ha! Ha! Grommets. ) Â "If things have gone wrong, I'm talking to myself, and you've got a wet towel wrapped around your head." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TenaciousG Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 13 minutes ago, SFGiants58 said: Nike, take notes from UA on UCLA stripes:   Other than that, I like the font change. The wordmark is fine (the old one was a bit too old-fashioned, IMHO), while the black swoosh is whatever (please no black alt) and the alternate design is fine. The logo standardization was a good move, but I wish they made the old helmet logo the print design. I do wish the socks had stripes, but oh well.  Overall, itâs good but could be better. If UA would just use the Clarendon number font their UCLA jerseys would be perfection.  I LOVE the numbers for the Colts but could do without the intrusive swoosh above the shoulder numbers. As much as itâs still logo creep I prefer the swoosh on the chest My teamsNCAA: Washington StateMLB: Seattle MarinersNFL: Seattle SeahawksNBA: Portland TrailblazersEPL: Liverpool FCMLS: Seattle Sounders FCNHL: Pittsburgh Penguins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschoolvikings Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 7 minutes ago, SFGiants58 said: Nike, take notes from UA on UCLA stripes:     I was just coming on to post that. It's a shame they didn't take the opportunity to insist that something be done about the cut-off shoulder stripes, as UCLA's most recent uniform proves that the idea that can't be done on a modern uniform is just industry blather. Nike wants to hold on to the illusion that there is something magical about their cookie cutter template, and teams don't care enough to push them.  As for the changes here... the numbers are nice, the retention of the gray mask was a great choice, the lack of socks stripes is unsurprising but disappointing, and the black swoosh is a transparent attempt to make Nike's logo more important.  http://dstewartpaint.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SFGiants58 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 It's not like Nike is adverse to extending shoulder loops either. Look at the "Victory Formation" template:   Trying this on a newer template is totally feasible and would allow them to push more product! MLB: Project 32 (Complete), MLB: The Defunct Saga (Complete) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radchad Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Yeah so I'd say new number font:Â definite upgrade new secondary logo:Â forced and unnecessary new wordmark font:Â fine, but I preferred the old one black swoosh: bad, but I guess I can live with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cujo Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Nitpick alert: Â They kept the same wonky NOB font. Ugh. Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pluggerplugger1 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Love nearly everything about this upgrade, save for the black swoosh. The new wordmark looks good, but I just don't feel it's as unique as their (now-) old wordmark. A font with a bit more Western feel, maybe? It does look dated now, but I think a 'refresh' of that old wordmark could work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFB Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 The more I see the logo and the wordmark interact with one another, the more I'm convinced they don't really mesh together:  If they make the wordmark letters a little closer to the uniform numbers with bigger serifs and angled-cuts, it feels a lot more natural IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maroon Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 2 hours ago, FinsUp1214 said: As a Colts fan...  Black swoosh on the road - stupid New wordmark - excellent Throwback numbers - excellent  I was hoping for some striped socks too, but I canât complain for the most part (aside from the odd minimal addition of black). They did a lot of good here.  Also as a Colts fan:  Black swoosh - stupid, but honestly harmless so long as black alternates are never ever a thing. Keep it on the swoosh and nowhere else and it's fine. New Wordmark - agreed that it's excellent. The old Colt wordmark may be "classic" or have "character" but it also always looked outdated to me. The new one is a quality workmark. Throwback numbers - also excellent Secondary Logo - Not great, but assuming it never supplants the horseshoe in any way, shape, or form then I really don't mind it existing. The fact that it's just on the collar of the uniform and not, say, adorning the sleeves means nothing was ruined. Grey facemask - glad it stayed grey.  More generally, I'm just really glad that the tweaks were just that - tweaks. No major overhaul of a classic, beautiful uniform that didn't really need changes. And if, in fact, the helmet logo now matches the actual primary logo then all the better. StL Cardinals - Indy Colts - Indiana Pacers - Let's Go Blues! - Missouri State Bears - IU Hoosiers - St Louis City SC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Admiral Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 The revised wordmark starts encroaching a little on the Bills' wordmark, if I'm not mistaken.  But you're absolutely right, the logo and wordmark don't match at all. I'm not sure to what extent the old one matched the logo and we just internalized them as going together because they always have, but if you're going to do something new, don't you have to make it all look like it goes together?  On the numbers: I don't mind them for the Colts, but ideally, it would be the Cowboys using the vintage serif numbers, and I feel like of those two teams, only one can take on that quirk because they're not too far apart, conceptually (royal blue, horse-oriented). ⫠oh yeah, board goes on, long after the thrill of postin' is gone ⫠Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GFB Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 7 minutes ago, the admiral said: The revised wordmark starts encroaching a little on the Bills' wordmark, if I'm not mistaken.   The Bills don't use block lettering, so I think there's enough difference between the two Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCM0313 Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 53 minutes ago, kestrel79 said: We all know down the road a anvil black and facemask gray alternate uniforms are coming...thanks Nike woof.  I like the number and font changes. Numbers maybe a touch too big and close together for my tastes but that's about all I got.  No blue pants? I really dug that look from the Harbaugh QB era. Blue pants wouldnât look good without striped socks, IMO. I still donât understand why Nike hates striped socks so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DG_ThenNowForever Posted April 13, 2020 Share Posted April 13, 2020 Re: Colts and Bills: Â Â Â Â Â Â 1 hour ago, ShutUpLutz! said: and the drunken doodoobags jumping off the tops of SUV's/vans/RV's onto tables because, oh yeah, they are drunken drug abusing doodoobags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.