Jump to content

Los Angeles NFL Brands Discussion


OnWis97

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

 

12 hours ago, CaliforniaGlowin said:
22 hours ago, ramsker said:

Whaaaaa? Make up your minds, y'all!!! 

 

All of this could be more puppet master Demoff's doing...

 

Yeah, it's a neon lights modificiation of a new logo. None of the neon lights logos from the draft caps are representative of the teams' actual logos.  We just have the benefit of already having seen all of the other logos in their standard applications.  All this says to me is that maybe we shouldn't judge the new logo until we see the actual new logo, instead of just a weird, outliney, not-colored-in version of it.

 

But liiiike, I can't wait to judge at that point!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, DPHF said:

 

 

Yeah, it's a neon lights modificiation of a new logo. None of the neon lights logos from the draft caps are representative of the teams' actual logos.  We just have the benefit of already having seen all of the other logos in their standard applications.  All this says to me is that maybe we shouldn't judge the new logo until we see the actual new logo, instead of just a weird, outliney, not-colored-in version of it.

 

But liiiike, I can't wait to judge at that point!  

 

There's a strong case that the neon lights logos are representative of the teams' actual logos, just modified. Otherwise they wouldn't be on draft hats. 

 

"Representative of" is a nebulous phrase used by the guy in LA.

Smart is believing half of what you hear. Genius is knowing which half.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AndrewMLind said:

 

I mean, the Jazz are navy, gold and green (all colors seen in that photo). Definitely not purple, though.

Most people don’t include the color of the field when thinking about what colors are represented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WSU151 said:

 

There's a strong case that the neon lights logos are representative of the teams' actual logos, just modified. Otherwise they wouldn't be on draft hats. 

 

"Representative of" is a nebulous phrase used by the guy in LA.

 

That's all I was saying. That tweet and its wording do nothing to make me think that cap logo isn't real.

 

In all likelihood, it is real. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, WSU151 said:

 

There's a strong case that the neon lights logos are representative of the teams' actual logos, just modified. Otherwise they wouldn't be on draft hats. 

 

"Representative of" is a nebulous phrase used by the guy in LA.

 

It's nebulous, but it's also a pretty accurate description.  With almost all of the logos, the use of the "neon" lines distorts them significantly, making them "representative" of the actual logos.  With the existing logos, we already know what the actual logos look so we can fill in the blanks in our minds, whereas we're left to speculate/guess with the Rams logo.

Most Liked Content of the Day -- February 15, 2017, August 21, 2017, August 22, 2017     /////      Proud Winner of the CCSLC Post of the Day Award -- April 8, 2008

Originator of the Upside Down Sarcasm Smilie -- November 1, 2005  🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, El Diablo said:

There's a kind of royal blue halo around the LA which makes me think that's gonna be the actual team color and the Navy is just the color they chose for the hat itself. Keep in mind this is just a guess.

 

I'm pretty sure that's just a lighting issue. All of the other neon hats are on a black background. That makes me think something weird happened with the exposure (whether on purpose or not) of the image to make everything appear lighter, which could also help explain the explanation that this hat isn't representative of the logo.

I've got a dribbble, check it out if you like my stuff; alternatively, if you hate my stuff, send it to your enemies to punish their insolence!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They shoulda just recolored the navy and gold Ram head logo.

 

They're not even fully going back to the original colors. They're keeping navy, so all they had to do was recolor the gold horns and outline yellow.

 

The solution was so simple...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, habsfan1 said:

They shoulda just recolored the navy and gold Ram head logo.

 

They're not even fully going back to the original colors. They're keeping navy, so all they had to do was recolor the gold horns and outline yellow.

 

The solution was so simple...

Yup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, habsfan1 said:

They shoulda just recolored the navy and gold Ram head logo.

They're not even fully going back to the original colors. They're keeping navy...

 

I'm a fan of the navy/metallic gold/white. It's a classy look. I always think of the "Golden Fleece" legend with the Rams, so met. gold's an appropriate element IMO.

They could add some light met. gold to the helmet horns, and not compromise that iconlc silhouette.

The helmets would then look like they belong to the navy/gold/white unis...

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2020 at 2:40 PM, sparky chewbarky said:

 

I'm a fan of the navy/metallic gold/white. It's a classy look. I always think of the "Golden Fleece" legend with the Rams, so met. gold's an appropriate element IMO.

They could add some light met. gold to the helmet horns, and not compromise that iconlc silhouette.

The helmets would then look like they belong to the navy/gold/white unis...

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

 

 

 

As a Rams fan, i don't hate this. Not what I'd choose, but better than what I fear will be the reality.

fiowXOD.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Krz said:

I’m just getting increasingly less optimistic about this.

Definitely not-on-topic, but these are my exact feelings on the Seattle NHL process. 

 

Back on topic, it is quite amazing that there hasn't been something that is going to be official that has been leaked. 

AmPJ0Ty.png 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, colinturner95 said:

It is quite amazing that there hasn't been something that is going to be official that has been leaked. 

 

We legit say this with EVERY reveal. 

spacer.png

On 11/19/2012 at 7:23 PM, oldschoolvikings said:
She’s still half convinced “Chris Creamer” is a porn site.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.